Pages

Monday, September 19, 2011

Focus Groups

Focus groups are distinguished from other methods of research because they tend to be less formal than interview or survey, although both may be used in addition to focus groups, and they tend to be participant led rather than led exclusively by the researcher. The focus group is meant to mimic conversation and allow participants to freely discuss a topic and respond to each other. This may give participants more room to talk out answers that might be complex or confusing.

Focus group data may be less generalizable than other forms of data because there are so many factors, it would be difficult to reproduce a similar focus group and produce the same conversation. Furthermore, as MacNealy suggests, focus groups may be more effective if the participants share similar interests or personality traits. This limits the populations that the results may be applied to. To ensure that focus group data maintains some aspect of generalizability, researchers should be should to provide some structure for the “conversation” and incorporate a moderator who is familiar with focus group protocol as well as the topic at hand. It may be of interest to a researcher to foster diversity in focus groups, rather than the homogeneity MacNealy recommends. This might allow for more diversity of opinions and a more representative sample, but may also make data collection and analysis difficult.

Focus groups may be more effective for tackling complex issues that affect specific communities. Because there is a moderately free flow of conversation, participants may feel more comfortable discussing and hashing out these issues, especially if they find that other members of the focus group have similar beliefs or experiences. Furthermore, participants may feel more comfortable in the informal focus group setting than in a more sterile, research-oriented environment. Used in tandem with interview or survey, focus groups may offer a deeper, social, and interpersonal explanation of the subject matter and participants’ experiences concerning it. However, it seems to me that collecting, transcribing, and analyzing data from focus groups may be difficult and time consuming. This would require research teams or partnerships. Moreover, I can easily see myself getting lost in a focus group and letting the conversation stray too far from the topic of interest. It is imperative to have a finessed moderator (and that moderator could probably never be me).

1 comment:

  1. I agree it is totally easy (for folks who like to talk -- like you and me) to get swept up in the conversation of the focus group. Even if it the talk is directly related to the research question, it is still hard to focus if you are trying to listen and take notes and keep up.

    I like your focus here on complexity. I think it's the real strength of focus groups - they help us make sense of complex things or zero in on theories or a hypothesis we might test later.

    ReplyDelete